All News & Insights

ML Journal

Welcome New Members of the MLC August 2025

Introducing the latest new members to the Manufacturing Leadership Council

Learn more about MLC membership.


Nathanael Aguilar

Senior Director Operations
Regal Rexnord

www.regalrexnord.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/nathanaelaguilar/

 

 

 


Ted Bill

Chief Executive Officer
Wire Experts Group

https://wireexperts.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ted-bill-0b49694/

 

 

 


Rick Camacho

Chief Supply Chain Officer
SC Johnson

https://www.scjohnson.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-camacho/

 

 


 

Rich Cammanaro

Chief Executive Officer
Tech Etch

https://techetch.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-a-cammarano/

 

 


Brian Cuttica

Senior Vice President of Sales, North America
Tacton

https://www.tacton.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/briancuttica/

 

 


Rick Davis

Chief Manufacturing and R&D Officer
Morgan Foods

https://www.morganfoods.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-davis-5105658/

 

 


Lisa Dietrich

EVP Chief Digital Information Officer
Lincoln Electric

www.lincolnelectric.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisa-dietrich-766a561/

 


Chris Droney

Chief Operating Officer
Milo’s Tea

https://drinkmilos.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisdroney/

 

 


Aviva Fink

Head of Marketing
Axion Ray

www.axionray.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/finkaviva/

 


Joe Laberge

Vice President of Information Technology
Husco

https://husco.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephlaberge/

 


Kyle McMillan

Chief Information and Technology Officer
Plexus Corporation

https://www.plexus.com/en-us/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mcmillan-kyle/

 


Brad Southwood

President – MacLean Fogg Component Solutions
MacLean-Fogg

www.macleanfogg.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradsouthwood/

 

ML Journal

Transforming Manufacturing with AI: Applications, Benefits, and How to Begin

AI is offering manufacturing benefits to the bottom line while also providing a path toward expansion into new products and services 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
AI and machine learning can unlock performance improvements by unraveling hidden patterns and allowing for data-driven decisions. workers with real-time information, guidance, and feedback.
Operational benefits include improved quality, reliability, dynamic scheduling, optimized supply chains and enhanced product design.
Successful AI deployment requires a strategic approach such as ensuring data readiness, developing skills, and planning to scale.  

 

Artificial intelligence is transforming manufacturing, equipping organizations with advanced tools to overcome challenges and accelerate performance. AI technologies like machine learning unlock opportunities to enhance quality, reduce downtime, meet sustainability goals, and stay competitive in today’s rapidly changing marketplace.

The Role of AI and ML in Manufacturing

AI simulates human intelligence for tasks such as decision-making and pattern recognition. Machine learning automates model building using data and through making self-improvements over time. These and other related technologies rapidly process large data sets, unravel hidden patterns, and enable factories to make data-driven decisions at scale, tackling core challenges in real time.

Key manufacturing hurdles, such as equipment breakdowns, schedule disruptions and inefficiencies, are now addressed with real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and automated optimization thanks to AI and ML.

Key Applications in Manufacturing

Quality Control
AI-driven systems use cameras and sensors to analyze products in real time and compare those images to 3D models to rapidly identify defects that manual inspections might miss. Machine learning uses historical quality data to predict and prevent emerging quality issues, ensuring high precision and reducing costly rework while minimizing waste. In addition, AI is now being used for “predictive quality” ­ – using historical data, data analysis, and predictive algorithms to anticipate and prevent quality issues before they happen.

Predictive Maintenance
Sensors collect operational data (like vibration and temperature), while ML algorithms compare that operational data to historical operational data that preceded failures in the past to predict future failures before they happen. This proactive approach extends equipment life, lowers unplanned downtime, and helps maintenance teams shift from routine checks to targeted interventions, conserving resources and budget.

Production Scheduling
AI optimization improves production schedules by balancing resources, deadlines, and disruptions. It dynamically updates plans to keep production flowing efficiently, even during equipment failures or sudden order changes. Utilizing ML for scheduling extends this even further by analyzing the root causes of past schedule deviations and proactively suggest more informed plans to avoid future issues/delays.

Key manufacturing hurdles, such as equipment breakdowns, schedule disruptions and inefficiencies, are now addressed through AI and ML.

 

Sustainability
AI enhances the sustainability of operations by cutting energy use and waste through collecting data such as energy consumption and water usage and then using ML to analyze resource consumption, pinpointing opportunities for energy savings. AI can also be used to refine logistics and supply routes, reducing environmental footprint and transportation costs.

Supply Chain Optimization
AI offers an unprecedented ability to respond to changes and opportunities by analyzing real-time data, exploring scenarios within constraints, predicting disruptions, and recommending timely alternatives. By forecasting demand surges or material shortages, it equips manufacturers with the ability to pivot quickly, maintaining operational continuity and helping them meet their business goals.

Assisted Machining Programming
Programming for machining equipment like CNCs is labor-intensive, requires significant training and experience, and is critical for quality. AI can collect and examine historical data using ML to generate optimal tool paths in seconds, improving throughput and accuracy and extending tool life, especially helpful for less experienced workers.

Custom Product Design
Generative AI tools create innovative product designs by processing constraints such as cost and durability. This empowers manufacturers to offer personalized products in sectors with rising customization demands.

Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing

  • Greater Productivity
    AI automates routine processes, enabling teams to focus on strategic work and enhancing overall throughput.
  • Cost Savings
    AI optimizes resource usage, reduces employee time, minimizes downtime, and improves equipment reliability. These capabilities reduce repair expenses, labor costs, and waste, delivering significant cost savings.
  • Improved Decision-Making
    Manufacturers use real-time analytics to adapt to disruptions, make quick strategic decisions, and allocate resources effectively.

A proactive approach extends equipment life, lowers unplanned downtime, and helps maintenance teams shift from routine checks to targeted interventions, conserving resources and budget.

 

  • Consistent Quality
    Automated quality checks lead to fewer defects and recalls, building stronger customer trust and brand reputation.
  • Stronger Sustainability
    Optimized energy use and material management advance sustainability goals and help satisfy increasing regulatory and consumer expectations.
  • Innovation and Competitive Edge
    By leveraging AI, manufacturers foster innovation, whether through adaptive systems, quicker design iteration, or more agile supply chains.

Real-World Success Stories

Artificial Intelligence is already elevating performance across the manufacturing spectrum:

  • Automotive: One manufacturer used automation to inspect more than 400 brackets and welding points, reducing quality inspection time by 75% and improving inspection accuracy by over 90%.
  • Aerospace: Using AI-driven quality inspection, one aerospace manufacturer was able to reduce the risk of missed quality defects by 90% while reducing overall quality inspection time by 40%.
  • Consumer Goods: A consumer packaged goods manufacturer is using AI-enabled logistics and supply chain planning to reduce sourcing and upstream transportation cost by 6-7% while reducing plan preparation time by 40%.

Other innovations such as factory layout design with generative AI and synthetic data for safer training continue to shape the future landscape.

Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing

Success with AI requires a structured, strategic approach:

  • Data Readiness
    Reliable AI depends on quality data. This requires an investment in sensors and IoT infrastructure to ensure robust, accessible operational data and, even more importantly, a clearly defined and strictly enforced data governance process to ensure the data collected is valid, applicable and accurate.
  • Start with Pilot Projects
    Analyze current areas of cost or inefficacy so that you can then focus on high-impact areas to validate performance and demonstrate value early on. You may find areas like predictive maintenance or quality inspection can provide quick time to value, but don’t limit yourself to evaluating those areas.
  • Develop Skills and Promote Collaboration
    Break down silos between IT, operations, and data teams by creating cross-functional teams to foster collaboration. Provide employees with training to effectively use AI systems, ensuring they feel confident in working alongside these technologies.

By starting small, leveraging data effectively, and planning for scalability, manufacturers can unlock the full potential of AI.

 

  • Use External Expertise
    Partner with proven AI experts – service providers or consultants – to bridge knowledge gaps and accelerate solution deployment.
  • Proceed with Transparency
    To increase employee buy-in, adopt AI systems that are easily explainable to your employees and that make decisions transparent and easy to understand.
  • Plan for Scalability
    Choose AI solutions that can scale across multiple production lines, facilities, or supply chains, ensuring long-term value as your operations grow.
  • Track Measurable Impact
    Demonstrate the value of AI by tracking key metrics, such as reduced downtime, higher output, or lower energy consumption, to gain executive support and secure further investment.

The Path Forward

Artificial intelligence is transforming manufacturing, addressing challenges in quality, productivity, cost, and sustainability. As AI and related technologies continue to evolve, manufacturers have an unprecedented opportunity to innovate and gain an edge in increasingly competitive markets. By starting small, leveraging data effectively, and planning for scalability, manufacturers can unlock the full potential of AI. The combination of advanced technology and human expertise offers limitless possibilities for progress. The time to embrace this transformation is now – those who act today will lead the industry tomorrow.  M

About the author:

 

Mike Bradford is Director, Strategic Business Development, at Dassault Systémes.

 

ML Journal

Shaping the AI-Powered Factory of the Future

MLC’s Future of Manufacturing Project report assesses AI’s current state and future promise. 

 

What separates manufacturing’s AI leaders from the laggards? To find out, MLC’s Future of Manufacturing Project surveyed top operations leaders about their current use cases, deployment challenges and future aspirations for AI. The result was a comprehensive report, Shaping the AI-Powered Factory of the Future.

Some of the report’s key findings include:

  • 68% of respondents said that AI will be foundational to future competitiveness.
  • Lack of useful data is the top challenge to AI adoption.
  • Individual contributors lead the majority of AI implementations, more frequently than company directives or tech providers.

Find out how manufacturers are measuring AI’s impact, their primary objectives for using AI, and what is hindering its broader adoption. This report can help you benchmark your company’s current AI usage and assist in creating an AI roadmap.

MLC members can access the report by logging into the MLC member portal and navigating to this linkM

 

ML Journal

The AI Divide: Manufacturing’s Pivotal Moment is Here

As artificial intelligence reshapes manufacturing competitiveness, organizations must act decisively or risk falling permanently behind their AI-enabled competitors. 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
AI technologies are enterprise ready now, and the benefits are quantifiable. The gap between leaders and laggards is widening.
Crowd-sourcing innovation at the individual contributor level is highly efficient for finding new solutions to evergreen problems.
Don’t forget training and enablement – lack of training is an emerging key blocker in accelerating value.  

 

The Rapid Pace of AI Evolution

A few years ago, the adoption of machine learning capabilities by manufacturers was limited. Computer vision models for quality (e.g. defect detection) were a common use-case, but broad adoption was limited by a host of issues, among them: the complexity and cost of training models, the lack of well-structured and organized data, and general hesitance about the technologies themselves by line-of-business leaders due to lack of knowledge and skepticism of ML approaches. Comfort levels increased with exposure, but AI was often looked at as just part of the toolkit available for continuous improvement – not a game-changer.

The emergence of generative AI since late 2022 has increased excitement (and hype) but also hesitance. Generative AI is something different and powerful – at this point surely all have been exposed to consumer apps like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. The potential for how impactful and transformative this technology could be was recognized early on, but proof-points were rare, and there were some very visible failures as well. In manufacturing the smart play has traditionally been to move slowly on new technologies; let others test it and mature until it is production ready.

Generative AI is Production-Ready

Over the last two years the gaps, weaknesses, and concerns about generative AI – like hallucinations, security risks, intellectual property concerns, and costs – have been identified and for the most part mitigated. Techniques like retrieval augmented generation using knowledge graphs, advances in capabilities like semantic understanding of diagrams/schematics, and now collaborative agents that can seek out information in other systems and synthesize it make generative AI able to get technical details correct. Cloud hyper-scalers provide secure infrastructure and managed services to build enterprise-ready AI applications without fear of their trade secrets and IP being exposed publicly. Costs for generative AI models have dropped significantly with Andreessen Horowitz noting the cost for equivalent performance is decreasing 10x every year (1000x reduction in three years). Generative AI is now enterprise- and production-ready.

AI Value Proof Points Are Here

Public proof points for how impactful AI can be are emerging and the results achieved are impressive in quality, maintenance, and production. Beyond these pinpoint use-cases, evidence highlighting the broader impact of generative AI is emerging as well. Early studies showed generative AI could free up ~4 hours/week for employees (the “ugliest hours of work” according to BCG), but how this translated into business value was largely hypothetical. Now we’re seeing rigorous research into generative AI’s benefits. A recent study by P&G and Harvard compared the work of both individuals and teams with AI and without AI. They found that AI accelerated the speed of the work with higher quality outputs. Individuals with AI produced higher quality output faster than teams without AI. The emergence of the AI co-worker is here.

Rethinking Old Ways of Doing Things

Manufacturers are now seeing truly transformative applications. In maintenance, one manufacturer is using generative AI to take sensor data from the line, identify emerging issues automatically, suggest possible root-causes, and what actions to take to resolve the issue. It also identifies the parts needed for repairs, estimates the repair costs, determines if expediting needs to occur, and can automatically create both maintenance work order and purchase order in the ERP system. Future versions already in progress will recommend updates to production schedules to adapt for maintenance issues automatically (with human in the loop oversight).

The emergence of generative AI since late 2022 has increased excitement (and hype) but also hesitance.

 

In quality, an innovative approach using generative AI to compare just one reference image to a live image for defect detection and/or anomaly detection is showing equivalent accuracy results to traditional ML computer vision models without the heavy burden of training models (having a large number of images, labeling them, and building the models – which can be sensitive to differences in lighting, object alignment, etc.). This approach is proving to be much more flexible, less sensitive to factory floor conditions, and doesn’t require the heavy lift of traditional training workloads. It caught the attention of the CEO of an ~$80b industrial at the recent Hannover Messe, who knows the limits of traditional ML.

At the plant, generative AI is being used to gather the information for the leader’s start of shift meeting, identify the top issues and challenges automatically, and then surface them and potential fixes using the standard process plant management already uses.  This shifts the burden on managers/supervisors from “administrivia” to unblocking production for the day. One head of manufacturing technology mentioned having the plant management team (production, maintenance, quality, safety, material management, and HR) going from 1-2 hours each in prep time per day to less than 15 minutes in total as a group – allowing them to focus on fixing the most important issues of the day.

A Widening Gap Between AI Leaders and Laggards

The gap between leaders and laggards in adopting AI is becoming well-documented. A recent study by PWC identified AI top performers (who have AI-specific operating models, embed generative AI-powered capabilities throughout their organizations, and have strong AI governance and responsible AI practices) are more than 2x likely to realize value than laggards. Similarly, they identified industries that were best positioned to adopt AI have had revenue growth that has far exceeded others – 27% vs. 8.5% in 2024. A recent EY study identified manufacturing as having the highest percentage of workers who viewed AI as a net positive, so the workers are ready.

Lead From the Front

But as Andy Jassy, CEO of Amazon says,there is no compression algorithm for experience.” Manufacturing leaders (C-suite and VP level) have awareness but are not using AI themselves. According to a recent Manufacturing Leadership Council survey, only 4% of the C-suite, 4% of senior plant leadership, 7% of department leaders, and 6% of floor supervisors use AI technology on a regular basis.

If manufacturing leaders want to realize the benefits of AI, they need experience using it. A $150b+ revenue automotive OEM recently shared that they opened access to generative AI models via a generative AI playground to all ~300,000 employees. After enablement training, they saw a 218% increase in experiments and exploration, which led to a 757% increase in production-deployed usage.

Studies found that AI accelerated the speed of work with higher quality outputs; individuals with AI produced higher quality output faster than teams without AI.

 

Exposure leads to results. Investing in hands-on experience from the top down is the most likely path to transformative new approaches to solving the consistent challenges of manufacturing. If leaders aren’t experiencing, innovating, and learning, they will be poorly prepared for disruptive changes to traditional processes. As recently as 2023, manufacturers were expecting significant changes to the workforce from AI – retraining, upskilling, or reassigning – but 65% of manufacturers were not budgeting for AI training.

Manufacturing Stands at a Defining Moment. Act Now.

The choice lying before manufacturers is clear and needs to be made now: accelerate adoption of AI technologies and embrace the change from the top down, or risk losing business to competitors who do. Decisive action can be taken: 1) leaders, including the C-suite, need to use AI technologies every day. One technique that is highly effective is to make each leader and team in the organization answer “how can I use AI to improve” – not “if I can use AI”; 2) providing self-serve AI platforms for all employees, regardless of level, will enable learning capabilities of the technology and how it can help solve business problems. This is a powerful crowd-sourcing mechanism for innovation and problem solving; providing broad exposure, or as one manufacturer phrased it “making AI like oxygen to us”, is a strategic investment and needs to be budgeted; don’t neglect training and enablement. Providing a platform to experiment without also providing examples of the art of the possible and practical how-to guides for hands-on training will slow or limit ideation and therefore benefits; and 3/) encourage the entire organization to rethink their approaches. Work backwards from the problems they need to solve, not the current approach.

AI, and especially generative AI, is a once in a generation transformative technology wave that is just now starting to crest. This is not the time for hesitating and cautious advancement – this approach worked well in the past but will harm you now. Embrace the uplift AI can bring broadly now or risk your competitors doing so and gaining a generational advantage. M

About the author

 

Danny Smith is Principal Strategist, Artificial Intelligence, AWS Automotive and Manufacturing at Amazon Web Services.

ML Journal

Using AI to Boost Supply Chain Visibility and Resiliency

AI overcomes traditional supply chain limits with real-time insights, automation, and predictive tools. 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
AI provides proactive intelligence that can overcome visibility and resilience gaps in traditional supply chain data.
AI enhances supply chain visibility by delivering real-time insight and automation, driving faster, smarter decisions across the supply chain with live data and predictive modeling.
AI helps strengthen and optimize internal operations, leading to reduced downtime and improving overall operational resilience.  

 

The last decade has demonstrated why supply chain resiliency and visibility are critical. Manufacturing organizations across all sectors have experienced significant disruptions, not only from the COVID-19 pandemic, but also geopolitical instability, labor strikes and climate-related events. In today’s interconnected world, a problem in one region can impact businesses globally.

Merely reacting to issues as they emerge is no longer a winning strategy. Companies need to anticipate disruptions and pivot proactively if they want to compete in the marketplace. Predicting supply chain issues and being proactive are key to prolonged success.

Fortunately, there is a solution that can be integrated into any company’s operations that provides rapid decision-making, creative problem-solving and anticipatory insights that drive meaningful impact.

What Are Supply Chain Visibility and Resiliency?

Before understanding how AI can transform supply chain visibility and resiliency, it’s important to define these two concepts and their connection. Visibility refers to the availability of real-time data and transparency across various supply chain nodes, from current inventory stock levels to ETAs for in-progress deliveries. On the other hand, supply chain resilience is a company’s ability to respond, adapt and recover in the event of a disruption. The faster operations are restored, the more resilient its supply chain is.

These two concepts are closely connected because greater visibility allows companies to react in the event of a disruption. For example, an unexpected shortage of components in Location A can be overcome much faster if planners have access to stock levels in other locations. With greater visibility into inventory at Location B, they can reallocate faster to correct the shortage at Location A, improving the company’s overall supply chain resiliency.

Challenges with Traditional Supply Chains

While once sufficient, traditional supply chain models now lack the visibility and resiliency needed for success in today’s environment for several reasons. First, traditional models are often siloed, with each location or production stream isolated from each other. This means planners at one site may have little insight into what is happening at the others.

Another disadvantage of 20th century operations management is its reliance on reactive models in which companies wait for problems to occur before acting. This keeps them on the defensive, losing time playing catch-up. Outdated systems without real-time monitoring also leave data gaps, hindering problem-solving and supply chain efficiency. By the time an analyst has exported historic data out of their ERP or CMMS, it is often too late to avoid impacting production.

Returning to the earlier example, a sudden shortage of a critical part at Location A could halt production. Because the hypothetical company lacks full supply chain visibility, planners may not realize that Location B has unused inventory available. Without a proactive strategy, the Location A team must wait for the new shipment of the part. And without real-time monitoring, no one knows when it will arrive, leaving the production line idle and triggering a company-wide domino effect.

How AI Enhances Supply Chain Visibility

Integrating AI into supply chains can profoundly impact visibility. Some key ways in which AI technology can improve global supply chain visibility include:

  • Machine learning models can be trained to provide constant demand forecasting, shipment tracking and anomaly detection. This gives planners advanced insights to anticipate and identify issues before they escalate. For example, a consistently underperforming supplier can be flagged early, allowing contingencies to be established before disruptions occur.
  • Computer vision systems integrated with AI can monitor warehouse inventory and track parts or product movement, even when usage is unreported. As stock levels of critical components dwindle, automated reordering systems can help prevent unexpected shortages.
  • IoT-enabled equipment within production facilities can interface with AI platforms to collect and analyze data in real time, leading to better-informed predictions and decisions.

Using AI to Build a More Resilient Supply Chain

AI also serves many important functions in helping companies build more resilient supply chain operations:

  • AI-driven simulations and digital twins let organizations stress-test various supply chain scenarios and ensure they are prepared. For instance, a manufacturer can simulate a production cycle and insert a disruption into the simulation to see likely outcomes.
  • Predictive risk management modeling offers insights into probable scenarios like extreme weather patterns, geopolitical risks and transportation delays. Accurately predicting a major disruption allows time to prepare alternate plans.
  • AI enables automated re-routing and decision-making based on live conditions. For instance, shipments can be redirected to minimize disruption from events like hurricanes or port shutdowns.

Connecting AI-Driven Supply Chain Resiliency to Industrial Maintenance and MRO Optimization

As important as it is to watch out for supply chain disruptions that originate outside the company, manufacturers also must be prepared for internal disruptions. Equipment outages can be just as devastating for manufacturing operations as weather patterns or part-sourcing issues.

Fortunately, AI plays a critical role in preventing these internal disruptions. Today’s IoT-enabled equipment uses sensors to feed real-time data on machine health, asset performance, and parts usage. Advanced AI platforms analyze this data to predict failures, allowing maintenance teams to plan preventive maintenance and keep machinery running longer.

This creates a closed-loop feedback system encompassing asset conditions, MRO inventory and supply chain response. It enables on-demand part ordering, optimized MRO inventory and fewer emergency repairs. By forecasting spare part usage from operational data trends, AI connects asset performance and field data with supply systems.

Implementing AI in Your Supply Chain: Considerations and Tips

If you want to leverage the power of AI and machine learning to make your supply chain more resilient and visible, keep the following in mind:

  • Start by assessing data quality and integration readiness. Poor data quality has historically masked problems, but large language models are becoming increasingly adept at seeing through poor data quality.
  • Choose platforms that support modular AI adoption, so you can test performance in certain areas before scaling enterprise wide.
  • Build internal capabilities or choose a partner that has experience with AI to speed up adoption, especially helpful for smaller manufacturers.

Why AI Is No Longer Optional

Forward-thinking manufacturers cannot afford to adopt a passive stance on AI integration. AI is now essential for enhancing supply chain visibility and resilience, empowering businesses to navigate disruptions more efficiently than ever.

About the author:

 

Edwin Good is the MRO & Supply Chain Director at Advanced Technology Services, Inc.

 

ML Journal

Scenes from Rethink 2025

MLC’s signature event broke records again this year as manufacturers gathered to accelerate their journeys to Manufacturing 4.0. 

 

The Manufacturing Leadership Council hosted the 21st iteration of its signature Rethink event in June at the JW Marriott hotel in Marco Island, Florida. Nearly 500 manufacturing executives, an in-person record, participated in the event over the course of its three days, which consisted of MLC’s annual Council Day meeting, its two-day conference program, and the Manufacturing Leadership Awards gala.

The theme of the event was Accelerating Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. Speakers hailed from Celanese, Siemens, Procter & Gamble, The Hershey Company, Eaton, Whirlpool, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Peterbilt, Husco, and Milo’s Tea, among others.

In a special session, EY gave an overview of economic trends affecting manufacturing. More than 20 technology and service providers demonstrated their innovations. And at the awards gala, more than 160 companies and individuals were honored for their achievements in digital manufacturing.

Following are selected scenes from the 21st Rethink. Photos by David Bohrer, Senior Director, Photography, at the NAM. M

MLC’s Board Chair Dan Dwight, president and CEO of Cooley Group, opens Rethink 2025.
Jay Timmons, the president and CEO of the NAM, MLC’s parent, describes policy initiatives in Washington that will help the manufacturing industry.
Following an update on economic trends by EY chief economist Greg Daco (far right), industry executives discuss their companies’ prospects in the months ahead. (l to r) moderator David R. Brousell of MLC, Wire Experts Group’s Ted Bill, Cooley Group’s Dan Dwight, and Titan International’s Paul Reitz.
A Monday afternoon luncheon panel discussion focused on How to Create a Thriving Organizational Culture with Communications and Emotional Intelligence Moderated by MLC’s Penelope Brown (far left), panelists included (l-r) EY’s Jennifer Fitzgerald, Zebra Technologies’ Kelly Nothaft, Oracle’s Rose Barry, and the Manufacturing Institute’s Carolyn Lee.
MLC Board Vice Chair Ron Castro of IBM and Chair Dan Dwight of Cooley Group open the Annual Council Meeting. MLC members received a report on the Council’s activities over the past year and discussed and voted on MLC’s Critical Issues agenda for the coming year.
Rethink attendees engage in lightning round presentations with technology and service companies in the event’s exhibition area.
In his opening address, MLC’s David R. Brousell talks about the importance of defining the human-machine relationship in the age of AI.
Siemens USA’s Barbara Humpton provides a CEO’s perspective on digital transformation.
Goldman Sachs’ Jack Anstey charts how Wall Street views digital transformation in manufacturing.
EnerSys’s Raphael Germe presents a case study on daily improvements through digital.
Accelerating digital and AI transformation for “10x manufacturing value” was the subject of a case study by Celanese’s Andrew Penton.
Handicapping the Global Digital Transformation Race was debated by a panel of leading manufacturing industry analysts. (l to r) Moderator David R. Brousell of MLC, IDC’s Bob Parker, ARC Advisory Group’s Craig Resnick, LNS Research’s Matt Littlefield, and Tech-Clarity’s Julie Fraser.
Demystifying autonomous operations was the subject of a panel discussion. (l to r) MLC’s David R. Brousell, as moderator; Cytiva’s Kevin Seaver, Rockwell Automation/Kalypso’s Tessa Myers; and Proctor & Gamble’s Alberto Gomez.
Hershey’s Will Bonifant, a member of MLC’s Board of Governors, describes Hershey’s Digital Factory and how it is driving manufacturing excellence.
Reimagining Reliability as a Growth Driver was the title of a panel discussion moderated by MLC’s Jeff Puma (far left). Panelists included (l to r) KIK Consumer Products’ Steve Schock and MaintainX’s Nick Haase.
Rethink attendees gather for an in-depth (Re)Think Tank.
Eaton’s Craig Sutton talks about how Eaton is scaling its digital transformation.
Shaping the Future of Digital Resilience in the AI Era was discussed by Coca-Cola’s Venkat Subramanian (center) and NTT DATA’s Prasoon Saxena (right). The session was moderated by MLC’s David R. Brousell (left).
Next generation leadership was the subject of a panel moderated by MLC’s Penelope Brown (left). Panelists included (l to r) CertainTeed’s CisLee Trost, Peterbilt’s Corey Roberts, Anheuser-Busch InBev’s Adele Martinat, and Whirlpool’s Trent Hensel.
IPG’s Emmauel Boullay shares IPG’s six-year transformation journey, from big data analytics to AI/ML implementation. IPG was the 2024 Large Manufacturer of the Year award winner in MLC’s awards program.
Unlocking Transformative Visibility and Control with 5G Core and Open RAN was the title of an executive interview. Joining moderator Jeff Puma (left) were AT&T’s Rob Soni and Ande Hazard.
MLC’s Steven Moskowitz (left) moderates a discussion about accelerated digital transformation in small and medium-size manufacturing companies with Husco’s Joe Pfaff, Cooley Group’s Dan Dwight and Milo’s Tea Company’s Chris Droney.
MLC’s David R. Brousell welcomes attendees to the 21st Manufacturing Leadership Awards Gala.
Finalists in the Business Model Transformation category gather on stage to be recognized for their achievements.
MLC’s David R. Brousell lead a tribute to John David Gagel, a member of the MLC Board of Governors and Chief Sustainability Officer at Lexmark, who died last year. Members of the Gagel family joined Brousell on stage.
Pure & Gentle wins the Manufacturer of the Year Award, Small/Medium Enterprise. Accepting the award is Darin Klaehn, joined by Cooley’s Dan Dwight (r) and MLC’s David R. Brousell.
Merck & Co., Inc.’s Besu Alemayehu is named the Manufacturing Leader of the Year. He is flanked by MLC’s David R. Brousell and NAM’s Jay Timmons (l).

About the author:

David Brousell

 

David R. Brousell is the Founder, Vice President and Executive Director, Manufacturing Leadership Council

 

ML Journal

Dialogue: At Merck, It Takes a Digital Village

 

From shared purpose to tech-powered teams, MLC’s 2025 Manufacturing Leader of the Year, Merck’s Besu Alemayehu, explains what it takes to drive digital transformation. 

   

JEFF PUMA: Hello and welcome to the Manufacturing Leadership Journal Executive Dialogue for August 2025. I’m Jeff Puma, content director for the Manufacturing Leadership Council. I’m excited to welcome Besu Alemayehu as our guest today.

In addition to his role as the senior vice president for digital manufacturing and supply at Merck, Besu was recently recognized at the 2025 Manufacturing Leadership Awards in the Digital Transformation Leadership category. And what’s more, he was named the 2025 Manufacturing Leader of the Year, which is the top individual honor handed out by the Manufacturing Leadership Council.

Besu, congratulations and thanks for joining me.

BESU ALEMAYEHU: Thank you. Thank you for having me.

JP: I want to start by taking us back a few weeks to the Manufacturing Leadership Awards Gala.

You didn’t know you were going to win, but I did. And from where I was sitting on sort of the side of the stage in the front, I could see you, and as I was watching NAM CEO Jay Timmons, he was describing the recipient of the award. He was sharing some really nice things that that person’s colleagues had said about him, but he hadn’t said your name yet. When he mentioned that the winner was born in Ethiopia it became obvious that he was talking about you, and I could see a big smile on your face. I could see the people around you start congratulating you. Can you take us back to that moment? What was it like to hear your name read along with all those other accolades that were mentioned in the lead up to the announcement?

BA: Thank you. It was surreal. A lot of things overwhelmed my mind for a few seconds. It took me a few seconds to realize the gravity of the recognition both personally and professionally. So a lot of things went into my mind.

The first thing which came to my mind was my mother, obviously. I was just talking to my son. I only have one son. I was excited about the digital transformation recognition, so I was sharing with family when I heard the Ethiopian introduction, and that’s when reality set in.

But it’s a very humbling moment. As I always say, “it takes a village.” It really did in the Merck case and it’s a team’s effort. It’s very humbling to represent the team and accept this award and recognition on their behalf.

But from humble beginnings in Ethiopia to being in a role which is impactful in saving lives and improving lives is one of rare opportunities in life. You need to recognize and acknowledge and accept the gravity of the work we’re doing in the life sciences industry.

So it was surreal, overwhelming.

JP: That’s great. And you mentioned in your speech, and just right now in your answer that “it takes a village,” and I want to talk about the team that you lead. It’s a fairly new team. It came into existence about two years ago if I understand correctly. How did this team get started? And how did you decide where to focus first when looking to create value?

BA: When I first joined Merck, and when the task was given to me, I spent the initial few weeks and months really listening. Coming into a very established organization and understanding the problem statement and realizing what it takes to get us from where we are to the destination was quite a task. So I spent some time, and it was obvious to me that there are certain things which needed to come together.

One is the clarity of strategy. Two was the partnership across the ecosystem. And three was the right sized team with the right skillsets in place was a must.

Once we have clarity of a strategy and clarity of that roadmap—the lighthouse, was what we said—then we need to bring in a diverse team. It’s not only technology. It needs to be a diverse team in skillsets. So we decided to combine it, but more importantly, one-third of that team should come from the outside with both technical and business expertise.

So that’s really what set us up for success. And this is really their success. What they were able to drive because of that diversity in thought, diversity in skills, diversity in backgrounds, and diversity in the way they came up through the ladders in their own journey really contributed to the success of this program. That was the defining moment for our success, to be quite frank.

The technology can be a fit for purpose. But really winning hearts and minds and aligning them behind one objective, one goal, one hill to conquer was the monumental task of this job.

 

JP: You mentioned that it is about people and not just technology. How did you get these individuals with this diverse background and these diverse thoughts, how did you get them to adopt a digital-first mindset?

BA: It was not easy. Technology is not a challenge once you get to know what you really need to do. The capabilities are out there. The technology can be a fit for purpose.

But really winning hearts and minds and aligning them behind one objective, one goal, one hill to conquer was the monumental task of this job.

So what did we do? First define that end goal. What that north star should look like.

And then define the paths and along the way bring both the technology experts, the business process experts, the science experts together—not only to deliver it, but to define the problem statement together, define the solution, design the solution together, deliver the solution together, and then eventually, run that that business with that capability—combined capability. Technology as not an enabler, but as part of the operation and part of the day-to-day.

So really aligning them behind that common goal, common objective and common hill to conquer, as I always say, is what really drove us to success, and what helped us achieve what we set out to do.

It was really that clarity of purpose and our job—our industry—luckily has clarity of purpose. Everyone in that team has someone who can benefit from the work we’re doing: distant relative, close relative, family member, friends. It was a purpose-driven initiative and aligning them behind that common objective was the defining moment for us.

And we still do that. We identified about 14 areas of opportunity for transformational opportunities, and the opportunity leaders always come from the subject matter expertise. And then they come under the one umbrella as one team, delivering one objective, with one team mindset and one objective. So really, the people in the team.

JP: What advice would you give to other manufacturing leaders as they try to align strategy with technology?

BA: I think the first thing is don’t think of those two as two separate and distinctly independent components of the business. They are one in the same in today’s day and age. I always joke about with my colleagues, my friends at work and the executives. I always say, “If you really want to test the importance of technology, I dare you to close it for a month and see if the business can run and if you can deliver on your objectives.”

I think that mindset that technology is no longer a support function, no longer a nice to have. It’s a must have. Starting with that mindset, is the first step towards that objective of taking it as a core component of your transformation and enablement.

Two, if you want to go further, bring the village together. If you want to be tactical, you can deliver a tactical solution. But in today’s day and age, there is no one component, one vertical which can deliver an end-to-end business transformation or business value.

So what do you do?

You bring that entire village together and then make them part of the solution and part of every step of the way as we go through this delivery and exercise. It’s really an important component to instill in the organization psyche and the organization’s culture.

And having a seat at the table. One of the things we did was the digital partners of the business areas, they are core members of their respective leadership teams. There’s no longer, “throw it over the fence.”

They are a core part of the strategy, core part of the execution, core part of the continuous improvement.

It’s really important to integrate all of those as one versus multiple parallels.

You bring that entire village together and then make them part of the solution and part of every step of the way as we go through this delivery and exercise.

 

 

JP: Let’s dive a little bit more into that. One of the most frequent topics and hurdles that we always hear about at the MLC is collaborating across functions and removing silos. How have you been able to foster collaboration that’s effective and leads to those positive outcomes?

BA: Well the first thing is knowing your audience, knowing the business problems and the problem statements. But more importantly, knowing your business as equal, if not more than your partners in the business, so that you can articulate the values based on outcomes—not on projects, not on cost but outcomes.

And once you start to show what good could look like in this focused outcomes-driven space, it becomes easier.

But usually change is hard especially for a successful company in our industries, multiple industries. If you have been successful for 100 years, why would you change today? So articulating that call for change, call for transformation is really, really important.

Second is really building that support. In our case—from the board to the CEO, down to the divisional leaders, to the CIDO, including his leadership team—we are all aligned and mandated to drive that change. To use [Merck CEO] Rob Davis’s terms: business is good, we’re doing really well, but everything has to change, because what got us here is not going to get us to the next few decades.

And the pipeline is the most promising pipeline with real impact to people, society and mankind at large. So really aligning and instilling that and showing that support spine up and down the food chain is really important, because it sends the message, it sends the tone, and it brings people and encourages people to speak up. And they are closest to the operations, so we do that.

And then, last but not least, is encouraging that speaking truth to power culture, that opened up culture, right? Look at what are the problem statements? What are the problem areas? What do you see as a pitfall for this initiative? Because they are the closest to the heart of it. And providing and creating that safe space where people can come and speak up, come and throw their ideas and challenge us on a continuous state, in a most constructive way. We’ll always open the doors.

You’ll be amazed, for this transformation—which has billions attached to it—we haven’t used any of the big name consulting firms. We really crowdsourced these opportunities, and we picked the 14 of them based on impact. And each and every one of them is returning value to the organization. So when you really unleash that power, when you bring that village together again and empower them. Create that safe space. Encourage a dialogue and healthy tension in the wire to encourage thinking outside of the box—there is no replacement for that in my mind.

JP: You’ve unleashed the power. Looking back at it as you think about the digital transformation to date, what surprised you most, either good or bad? And how did you adapt or change things in order to take advantage of the good things and overcome the bad?

BA: What surprised me the most, positively, was the packed power of Merck’s talent. The people in the organization. How much they know. How much dedication there is in the system, and the belief in the mission of Merck and the work they do. That was really powerful for me.

We think we know it all when we are in the industry for 30 years, but this [next] generation went to school with no textbooks. Their way of thinking about digital and technology and enablement is incredible.

 

And what surprised me the most is again, the people, the strong resistance for change. But once you really understand the strengths and the opportunity, and you manage to create that bond between the two—the strength and the opportunity—and show that, as I always say, in simple kindergarten ways, so that anyone can digest it because it’s a multifaceted transformation. What it means to supply chain to quality, to the engineering is very different. So developing that skill and that simplicity in the system to show in such a simple and understandable way was a big challenge. Once we were able to close that gap between the two, it was an easier journey to the end.

And the third one—which really surprised me—was once people understood, all of that resistance turned into a demand. A demand we’re not able to satisfy. We created a monster in a way, in the system. The hunger for more data, interconnectivity, insights to run our business that I didn’t expect. We’re working so hard to penetrate through that resistance, and once we passed that what we didn’t anticipate was how fast we needed to go. That was a big miss on our part, but not in a bad way, in a good way.

JP: I have two more questions, and I want to shift to thinking about the future for these questions. So how should current leaders go about cultivating and nurturing the next generation of future leaders?

BA: I think it’s amazing, this new generation of leaders, engineers, manufacturing experts. How they think is very different. How they are wired is very different. How they are formed and educated is very different. The insights they bring into an established organization—manufacturing is an industry with a very long history—as they come into that fold, I think we need to receive them with an open mind and be open to listen. Because what they see is amazing, and how simply they think and how quickly they can bring an impact to the organization is really important. For me, encouraging them to speak up and encouraging the innovative tools and creating that mechanism that can hit the system so that we can benefit from these great ideas, innovative thinking, and outside the box thinking is really important. So encouraging coaching and mentoring is really important.

But, more importantly, I tell my colleagues, “Be humble.” We think we know it all when we are in the industry for 30 years, but this generation went to school with no textbooks. Their way of thinking about digital and technology and enablement is incredible. Quite a few of my young employees don’t even have checkbooks anymore. They are natively digital and bringing them to our industry and forcing them to go back to paper when they don’t even know how to legibly write certain things, is not very constructive. So be open, be humble, encourage that new way of thinking, new way of looking at things, because the future is very different than what has been for the last 30 or 40 years. The future is digital. The future is native digital, integrated digital.

And with AI coming to the mix, now insights and decision making on the fly is going to be a basic requirement of any good business in the future—any good manufacturing in our case.

So being open, being humble and continuously coaching and mentoring this new generation of leaders and engineers to continue to think innovatively and challenge the status quo and dare to speak up is really what should set us apart in the future.

JP: So, speaking of the future, what about the digital manufacturing future really makes you excited? Maybe not just at Merck, but across all of industry.

BA: At the MLC [Rethink], I was fascinated by some of the use case presented. How the industry is thinking outside of the box. How the industry is innovating with these new capabilities coming up.

When I think about the future of manufacturing, all I think about is that fully automated, fully integrated, fully digitally enabled, and data savvy industries are what I see across the board.

 

When I think about the future of manufacturing, all I think about is that fully automated, fully integrated, fully digitally enabled, and data savvy industries are what I see across the board. From the way we design our molecules in our case, or the cars, or the planes, or the robotics, to how we deliver, how we draw insights from every data, and how we predictably intervene and continuously improve our designs by getting that feedback loop mechanism into our system.

I think the future is digital and manufacturing could benefit a great deal, because if you look at the cost of any production, manufacturing and supply are a big component.

And if you look at the opportunities today in our space. They revolve around those 2-3 areas, between logistics and post-market data and continuous improvement of your product specifications or molecule improvements. It’s all digital, it’s all in the manufacturing space, and I’m super excited, not only for me and my generation, but for the coming generations because they are bound to do great things because it’s an opportunity-rich space. And within that space there are a lot of great innovations to be done. And I can see it. It’s coming. It’s coming and it’s coming fast and furious. So, we need to get ready for it.

JP: Excellent. Well, thank you for your answers and congrats, again, on being named the 2025 Manufacturing Leader of the Year.

We’re excited to hopefully continue our conversations with you, and perhaps bring you back for Rethink in 2026 if you’re available. You have a wealth of information to share some incredible examples. And a great mindset of how to deal with your teams and with digital transformation, and bring it all together with people and technology and organizational change. Thank you so much for being here and sharing these insights.

BA: No, thank you, thank you. I look forward to the next Rethink. Thank you very much. M

 

About the Interviewer:

 

Jeff Puma is content director for the NAM’s Manufacturing Leadership Council

 

ML Journal

Defining the Human-Machine Relationship

In his Rethink speech in June, MLC’s founder said manufacturers should take a proactive approach to decide what increasingly intelligent, AI-powered machines should and shouldn’t do. 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
AI-powered machines are now outperforming humans in seven important technical benchmarks..
A new human-machine “hybrid model” is emerging that will equate synthetic intelligence with biological intelligence.
Manufacturers should appoint an executive to study and define the human-machine relationship in their organizations.  

 

In 1950, the great British mathematician Alan Turing authored a paper called “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” in the academic journal Mind, published by Oxford University Press. In the first sentence of that paper he asked a question that has been the subject of passionate discussion and debate, intense research, and endless fascination for 75 years:

Can machines think?

In something of an answer to his own question Turing said: “We may hope that machines will eventually compete with men in all purely intellectual fields.”

Today, as a result of advances in artificial intelligence, computing, communications networks, and the availability of ever-larger data sets with which machines can process information, Turing’s question has been superseded by many other questions, some existential, that we must ask in the Age of AI.

To what extent should we allow intelligent machines to act? What types of decisions should they be empowered to make? Should they be trusted? Can they be co-equal partners with human beings? How shall we define the status of AI-powered intelligence machines in relation to human beings?

How the human-machine relationship is defined will profoundly influence business, government, and society.

 

The answers to these and other related questions will not only have implications for manufacturing, but will also profoundly influence politics and government policy, military strategy, the nature and future of work, and many dimensions of everyday life.

As Henry Kissinger, Craig Mundie and Eric Schmidt say in their 2024 book “Genesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope and the Human Spirit”: “New forms of AI and human responses to them could transform nothing less than the human relationship to reality and to truth, the exploration of knowledge as well as the physical evolution of humanity, the conduct of diplomacy, and the international system. These are among the crucial issues of the coming decades, and they ought to be the guiding concerns of leaders in every arena.”

And so today I pose to you a key question of our time: What does it mean to be human in the Age of AI?

The Relationship is Dramatically Changing

No doubt prior generations had to understand their relationships to tools and machines as the devices evolved over the centuries. But much of this had to do with physical relationships – with a hammer, a saw, an axe, a loom, a steam engine, an electrically-powered moving assembly line, a press, an injection molding machine, etc.

Being human was always more defined by attributes such as creativity, critical thinking, contextual awareness, judgement, curiosity, and, of course, having a soul and a connection to the divine.

Some researchers have delineated the evolution of the human-machine relationship across what is called the 5C model – co-existence, cooperation, collaboration, and, in the future, compassion, and co-evolution.

In our own time, the human-machine relationship has been traditionally designed as a master-servant relationship, where the human directly controls what the machine will do and when it will do it through an interface.

Machines will reach a level of intelligence that enables them to execute tasks and make decisions autonomously.

 

But AI is changing this design, and in dramatic ways. In coming years, our notions of intelligence will be reshaped by what EY Global Vice Chair Hanne Jesca Bax calls “the next generation of disruptive technologies” – AI, and in particular, GenAI; quantum computing, which will increase the speed and scale of AI by orders of magnitude; the metaverse, by providing different human-machine interfaces; and brain-machine interfaces themselves, which will connect our biological and silicon brains.

In short, we are in the midst of moving from a time of automation, where the human still directs the machine, to where machines will reach a level of intelligence that enables the machine to execute tasks autonomously, without pre-defined instructions.

As a paper published last year by researchers from the University of Bonn and Aachen University in Germany said: “The previously accepted understanding that autonomy is only applicable to humans has been invalidated.”

AI is Already Outperforming Humans

So, what is the tale of the tape, so to speak, between humans and machines?

In its 2025 AI Index Report, Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence unit said that AI-powered systems have now out-performed humans on seven of eight technical performance benchmarks. These benchmarks include: image classification; medium-level reading comprehension; multi-task language understanding; PhD-level science questions; visual reasoning; English language understanding; and competition-level mathematics. Only in multi-modal understanding and reasoning did humans do better than AI.

But Stanford said that the velocity of AI development cannot be underestimated. “The performance gap between AI and humans is shrinking rapidly,” the Stanford report said. “For example, on competition-level mathematics, state-of-the-art AI systems are now 7.9 percentage points ahead of human performance, a significant improvement from the 0.3-point gap in 2024.”

While human intelligence has been augmented by technology for many years – think spreadsheets, BI tools, search engines, GPS – it is now being re-shaped in such a fundamental way that a new model is emerging, which EY’s Bax calls a “human-machine hybrid.” In this model, synthetic intelligence shares an equal plain with biological intelligence. “AI will commoditize the application of knowledge,” she says.

This development has led some in our industry to posit that a new industrial revolution needs to take place. The Fifth Industrial Revolution, correcting what is claimed was the insufficiency of human aspects in the Fourth IR, is described by its proponents as a human-centered revolution.

“Industry 4.0 is dedicated to the realization of mass customization ideas,” said researchers from Lublin University of Technology in Poland, in a 2023 report. “Industry 5.0 redefines the man-machine relationship by restoring the human aspect to production. The collaborative relationship dominates, with the issue of compassion and coevolution still an issue of the future. “

But the general idea of a Fifth Industrial Revolution, should one be warranted, has hardly gathered consensus. In 2022, the European Commission said the threat of climate change should be the focus of a fifth IR.

Manufacturers should be aware of the many challenges arising from the human-machine relationship.

 

This didn’t go over well in Germany, the birthplace of Industrie 4.0. Last year at Hannover Fair, Acatech, the National Academy of Science and Engineering in Germany, issued a statement strongly criticizing what it called “the frivolous positioning of the unnecessary term Industry 5.0

“… the new term Industry 5.0 is not needed,” Acatech said, “…because ‘human-centricity’ and societal benefits have been the most important goals of Industrie 4.0 from the outset. … it falsely suggests that the fourth industrial revolution is complete and that our attention can be turned to new topics.”

For its part, MLC has had a core focus on the human aspects of what we call Manufacturing 4.0, particularly the leadership dimension, since we introduced the concept of Progressive Manufacturing in 2004. Our vision of the next great leap forward is what I termed last year as The Reinvention Revolution.

This fifth IR will center around building on the accomplishments of M4.0 to reimagine business models, achieve full enterprise-wide cross-functional integration in our companies, data sharing, and connected communities.

A high degree of automation and autonomy will become standard as AI is infused in nearly every functional area and system. And the industry will learn to work outside its silos.

Rapid innovation, fast time-to-market, great flexibility, acute visibility into operations and supply chains, and the ability to personalize products will be hallmarks of performance. Taken together, these and other elements, successfully executed, will characterize leading mid-twentieth century manufacturing companies and how they are an active part of a connected mid-century industry.

Manufacturing Leaders Must Step Up

But it must be said that if we have underestimated anything it is the rapid rise and development of AI. At our Future of Manufacturing conference in December of last year, I discussed with you the worldwide competition for AI supremacy. In our 2022 White Paper, “The Next Phase of Digital Evolution,” MLC pointedly called out the importance for the industry to define the human-machine relationship as machines become increasingly intelligent. And in my Rethink talk last year, one of the Decision Points I offered was that we must be “very deliberate” about how we define that relationship.

So I think I have made the case this morning that defining the human-machine relationship is not an abstract academic exercise. There are real-world effects now of how we will make decisions, how and what kinds of work will be performed, how we will organize our companies, and how we will relate to intelligence machines and vice versa.

It is incumbent upon us as manufacturing leaders to define where the lines are of what is permissible and desirable and where the guard rails should be even as the technology matures and becomes more powerful and capable. We cannot take the position that things will just work themselves out. We are not dealing in just the familiar physical world anymore.

We are dealing with what the political analyst and commentator Ian Bremmer of the Eurasian Group calls: “humanity’s first encounter with a superior intelligence.”

Five Recommendations

So what are some of the things we can do now?

The short answer is there is much we can do now, thanks to a lot of thought a number of organizations, including MLC members, have put into the human-machine relationship.

Here is what I would call some consensus guidance:

  • First, approach the subject of the human-machine relationship deliberately and proactively. Appoint someone in your organization to study the relationship as it exists today and how it may develop in the next five years or so and come back with recommendations.
  • Second, figure out who in the organization should lead the management of the relationship going forward. In a recent Deloitte State of AI research report, 43% of respondents indicated that their organizations have already appointed a leader responsible for helping humans collaborate better with intelligent machines – and it’s not currently the Chief HR Officer. But Deloitte recommends redefining the CHRO’s function to that of Chief Human and Machine Resource Officer. In what it calls “anthropomorphizing AI”, Deloitte suggests treating AI as a kind of digital worker, in which it is considered a talent source when hiring. Deloitte authors Sue Cantrell, Brad Kreit and Tom Davenport even go further, saying that AIs could be given a performance review, set of KPIs, a place in the org chart, and even – believe it or not — a retirement plan! (Where do I sign up?)
  • Third, assuming that many will adopt what I mentioned earlier as the “hybrid model” in which people and machines work increasingly close together, redesign your factory floor work environments around three things — people, who will need to be upskilled; increasingly more powerful machines; and growing volumes of well-analyzed data. Trust and inclusivity are key goals of any redesign. And a key design principle is what LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman calls for in his book Super Agency. “When AI becomes a co-pilot rather than a competitor,” he says, “it becomes amplification technology.”
  • Fourth, decide what types of decisions you are comfortable having an AI make in a production or supply chain environment. This is obviously a moving target as technology develops. And it will challenge our long-held rule of always having a human in the loop.
  • Fifth, be aware of the many challenges that will result from the relationship. There is always a downside to technology. The redesigns I mentioned could result in greater organizational complexity and more complex work for people. The more people interact with an AI, the more there may be a potential for greater reliance on it. Pervasive use of AI could also result in human isolation and even laziness. Could we become too dependent on AI?

Remembering the Eternal Truths

So, I’ll pose the question one last time. What does it mean to be human in the Age of AI?

Let’s put aside the tech-speak and managerial-speak for a moment.

Frankly, we’ve always known, since antiquity, what it means to be human. The eternal truths never change.

Plato felt that man should focus on eternal forms that are timeless. Eternal things do not change in time, Plato believed.

As we allow ourselves to be dazzled by technological possibilities and new ways of working and interacting with people and intelligent machines, let us also renew our embrace of those things that Plato long ago identified as eternal – honesty, truth, loyalty, love, spirit, faith, and, if I may add one of my own, the dignity and non-negotiable worth of the individual human being.

These timeless things keep us grounded and will provide the unyielding foundation to enable us to travel, together, to a better future in the Age of AI, one in which men and women everywhere will walk tall in the bright sunshine of dignity and freedom.  M

 

About the author:

David Brousell

 

David R. Brousell is the Founder, Vice President and Executive Director, Manufacturing Leadership Council

ML Journal

Maximizing Continuous Improvement with GenAI

Generative AI tools have the potential to raise continuous improvement to a new level – continuous intelligence.  

 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
Manufacturers face hurdles in trying to advance continuous improvement initiatives due to sustainability and connectivity issues.
GenAI tools can enhance the efforts of human CI practitioners.
Challenges with GenAI tools include data security and readiness, integration with legacy systems, and ROI.   

 

Manufacturing organizations are built around lean, agile, iterative processes, and a core component of operational excellence is continuous improvement (CI). This has long been a top priority for manufacturers. Across functions, manufacturers rank CI as among the most mature areas of operation, according to Deloitte’s 2025 Smart Manufacturing Survey. Yet, the tools and workflows that enable CI have not always kept pace with innovation. To contend with some of the most stubborn CI challenges in today’s manufacturing environment, enterprises can look to maturing AI capabilities that support faster improvement cycles, digitization, and sustained change.

The initial hype around Generative AI (GenAI) produced a wave of pilots and demonstrations, but measurable value and ROI were in many cases elusive. The early excitement has given way to a more grounded, strategic view of GenAI’s value. In CI, using GenAI to automate aspects of workflows supports efficiency, preserves change, and captures the financial impact of change. Just as importantly, it can enhance the workforce experience by empowering workers with modern tools that help them perform to their greatest capacity. It also sets the stage for exploring end-to-end capabilities with agentic systems that not only autonomously perform a task but also determine independently how best to do so.

Exploring the value, challenges, and stakeholders reveals that a significant CI opportunity is within reach.

A Digital, GenAI-enabled CI Function

CI strives to make incremental and aggregated improvements to processes, procedures, production, and maintenance such that standard work improves over time and is maintained. It creates value by systematically removing waste and standardizing leading practices.

The most significant challenge is the long-term sustainability of improvements. Some manufacturers have taken steps to digitize continuous improvement, leveraging integrated systems to capture, track, monitor, and maintain change. But few organizations have been successful with digital CI. Much of CI today is manual or relies on disconnected tools, such as spreadsheets for tracking KPIs, specialized CI software (often disconnected from operational systems), custom dashboards, and manual handoffs between systems.

Nevertheless, many manufacturers are striving to improve operations while contending with sustainability and connectivity issues that often hinder CI implementations.

The tools and workflows that enable continuous improvement have not kept pace with innovation.

 

Imagine a GenAI-enabled system that continuously analyzes process data across systems, automatically documents knowledge, predicts variations before they occur, and verifies that improvements are sustained. These advances can be realized while also quantifying the financial impact of each change and identifying improvements that are transferable to other production lines or facilities. With GenAI, CI shifts from periodic initiatives to continuous intelligence that creates institutional memory and builds on past successes.

Leveraging GenAI enhances the efforts of human CI practitioners and establishes CI as a strategic enabler for operations leaders. It is a tool to navigate complexity, reduce executive burden, enhance organizational resilience, and improve the ability to make the right decision quickly.

A Closer Look at Capturing and Measuring Value

GenAI for CI can help address system and data gaps that have frustrated implementation and sustainability in the past. Consider three high-impact use cases where GenAI can improve CI:

Root cause analysis – GenAI can accelerate issue resolution by rapidly aggregating data from sources like shift reports, lab results, and SOPs. Integrated with digital twins for advanced simulations, GenAI-enabled applications can conduct iterative testing and generate detailed documentation. This supports the digitization of CI, moving from time-consuming, sometimes manual tasks to a connected, automated process overseen by CI professionals.

Preventive maintenance – CI often relies on static schedules. GenAI applications can continuously monitor operational data to predict specific component failures, optimize maintenance timing, trigger automatic parts ordering, generate tailored work instructions, and refine predictive models based on real-world results. This helps identify and sustain improvements by leveraging automation across the interconnected components of CI.

Quality control – When process deviations arise, GenAI can consolidate data from multiple systems, generate and test hypotheses, simulate process changes, and validate the effectiveness of corrective actions. It can also standardize documentation and disseminate lessons learned across the organization. The impact is found in more fully digitizing quality control and sustaining improvements through near-real-time autonomous issue detection and resolution.

GenAI applications go beyond analytics and impact end-to-end workflows. They help integrate data, generate insights, drive action, and document outcomes. GenAI for CI brings together data and process automation to help humans make faster and better decisions. Considering enterprise-level and functional impacts, manufacturers may leverage two value measurement approaches for assessing ROI.

For functional value, manufacturers should look to a reduction in process variability, a decrease in maintenance downtime, improvement in first-pass yield, time saved in decision-making processes, and reduction in knowledge transfer time for new employees. At the enterprise level, KPIs to monitor include improvements in overall equipment effectiveness, a reduction in unit costs, an optimization of working capital, increased revenue per employee, and reduced time-to-market for new products.

Additionally, unlike traditional technology investments that depreciate, GenAI (and agentic systems) present compounding ROI over time as the system learns and improves. As such, ROI calculations should highlight both initial benefits and accelerating returns. Implementing a balanced scorecard with leading indicators (process improvements) and lagging indicators (financial outcomes) helps build confidence and capture value during transformation.

Challenges With Adoption

To date, manufacturers have been cautious about GenAI’s practical value. Just 24% have deployed a GenAI solution at the facility or network level, and only 38% are piloting GenAI applications, according to Deloitte’s 2025 Smart Manufacturing Survey. This cautious approach is strategic, as manufacturers have concerns around data security, intellectual property protection, data readiness, and integration with legacy systems and workflows. There are also potential risks from unproven technology disrupting production, a possible lack of clarity around ROI and implementation costs, and the challenge of change management and adoption among frontline workers.

As such, leveraging GenAI for CI may prompt some initial executive skepticism. The work and change required to maximize outcomes is significant. With operations stretched thin and facing supply chain disruptions and workforce shortages, new technology projects may be a low priority. Meanwhile, technology leaders may have valid concerns about enterprise readiness for GenAI, in particular issues with data quality, integration, new maintenance requirements, and security. Ultimately, there may be an impression that GenAI for CI is a burden rather than an asset. Marginal or uncertain value may not be enough to justify the work and investment needed to maximize ROI.

Leveraging GenAI establishes CI as a strategic enabler for operations leaders.

 

With CI, manufacturers need confidence and clarity in the outsized value GenAI can deliver. Addressing pressure on operations with GenAI moves toward alleviating (rather than creating) burdens. GenAI relies on data and technology investments already made, constituting a force multiplier. What is more, GenAI and agentic systems can function with imperfect data. Whereas more traditional AI systems typically require complete, structured, and highly accurate datasets, GenAI applications can accommodate unstructured, incomplete data by inferring data based on other sources and patterns. This capability is suited to the sometimes messy, physical world of manufacturing.

A Team Effort for Value

GenAI for CI requires the participation of stakeholders across the enterprise. Rather than a technology demonstration performed in isolation, a transformational initiative takes collective leadership, and stakeholders play distinct roles.

To raise the opportunity and catalyze discussion and investment, the most credible originator is an operations leader with firsthand CI experience who is teamed up with a technology leader who appreciates the potential of GenAI and agentic systems. The key decision-makers change as implementation scales. Initial project approval may come from operations leaders attempting to address specific pain points in CI. Presuming value is captured and scale is justified, IT leadership steps in to address integration challenges with the manufacturer’s technology and software. And based on demonstrated success, the CFO and CEO can grant approval for enterprise-wide deployment.

This is a true team effort. If IT drives the initiative without operations buy-in, it could be seen as a “technology project looking for a problem.” The finance team might focus on immediate ROI, neglecting the longer-term transformational potential. The scope and authority of single facility leaders is too narrow for an enterprise-level project. Given the unknowns, complexity, risks, and timeline, GenAI in CI needs to have executive-level buy-in across the lifecycle of the investment.

Root cause analysis, preventive maintenance, and quality control are three high-impact uses cases for GenAI.

 

There is another important stakeholder group – the workforce. Manufacturers face significant challenges in attracting and retaining talent. Tools that help CI professionals perform their tasks more effectively and efficiently enhance the impression that employees are engaged in valuable, mission-based work. The manufacturing environment presents unique tooling and interfaces, and leveraging GenAI and agentic frameworks can remove the embedded friction between systems and processes while giving employees modern tools that improve the work experience.

Moving Forward with GenAI and CI

Many manufacturers already enjoy significant CI maturity, and this function will continue to be an imperative for years to come. For enterprises already on a technology transformation journey, leaning in with GenAI deployments can extract more value from investments already made. To get started, leaders can identify CI value targets and begin to embed GenAI use cases in the enterprise’s transformation roadmap. Value can be tied to specific KPIs related to productivity and efficiency, but GenAI in CI may offer more intangible rewards that should also be reflected in the enterprise strategy, such as improvements in talent recruitment and workforce retention.

One place to start is by capturing quick wins with discrete deployments that improve a component of CI. Taking a phased approach to value delivery with clear governance models and security architecture can evidence the value of GenAI in CI. This fuels confidence and supports further investment while also giving the enterprise time to make incremental improvements to data readiness, security, and maintenance.

CI remains a major focus in manufacturing. GenAI and agentic systems present an opportunity to transform how CI is performed, creating efficiency, shifting to fully digital processes, and sustaining change and improvements over time.  M

About the authors:

 

Saeed Haq is a Technology Fellow at Deloitte Consulting LLP and a smart manufacturing architecture and data and analytics strategy leader in Deloitte’s AI & Engineering practice.

 

 

Brian Zakrajsek is a Specialist Leader with Deloitte Consulting LLP, leading solution architecture for the US Smart Manufacturing practice.

 

ML Journal

Connectivity and AI Drive the Future of Manufacturing

Advanced networks and intelligent technologies are creating agile, secure and high-performing smart factories. 

 

TAKEAWAYS:
AI combined with fiber optics, 5G and edge computing is revolutionizing manufacturing.
Real-world examples like digital twins, autonomous logistics and AI quality control show how this integration improves performance and flexibility.
A strong framework of sensing, edge computing, hybrid networks, cloud analytics, workforce readiness and security is key to successful AI deployment in factories.   

 

Advanced manufacturing is quickly changing from traditional assembly lines into smart, connected systems.

This shift is being fueled by the powerful combination of artificial intelligence and new connectivity technologies like fiber optics, 5G and edge computing. Together, these innovations help factories run more efficiently, flexibly and smoothly, ushering in a new age of smart manufacturing.

Connectivity: The foundation of AI-driven manufacturing

AI works best in manufacturing when it can quickly access and process massive amounts of data. That’s why strong connectivity is a key foundation for modern smart factories.

Fiber optics: The fast data highway

Fiber optic networks deliver extremely high bandwidth and low latency, which is essential to handle the large data streams from IoT sensors, machines and AI systems.

Unlike copper or wireless links, fiber offers stable, interference-free connections critical for time-sensitive manufacturing operations. This infrastructure supports centralized AI analytics, seamless inter-factory communications and cloud integration, helping smooth the flow of information and control commands.

Fiber connections also enhance security because they are less vulnerable to electromagnetic interference and eavesdropping, helping to protect sensitive manufacturing information from cyberattacks.

5G networks: Wireless freedom and scalability

While fiber serves fixed infrastructures, 5G offers wireless flexibility with multi-gigabit speeds and near-real-time responsiveness.

At industrial sites, 5G enables mobile robots, autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs) and wireless sensors to operate without the constraints of cables. In addition, 5G cellular signals travel farther and propagate better in challenging environments, which enables both workers and machines to get a more reliable connection to complete the workflow with more efficiency.

At non-industrial campuses, 5G enables dedicated airwaves that are not subject to the same interference challenges you get with unlicensed spectrum such as Wi-Fi, which means better overall performance.

The ability of 5G to create network slices means manufacturers can dedicate bandwidth and low-latency channels to mission-critical applications, helping to ensure that control signals have priority over less urgent data. This wireless freedom allows rapid reconfiguration of production lines and material flows without the expense and downtime of physical rewiring.

Moreover, 5G includes strong built-in security like encryption, authentication and network isolation, which helps protect important manufacturing processes from hacking and unauthorized access.

Edge computing: Smart processing close to the source

Edge computing tackles the delay and bandwidth challenges that come with sending all data to distant clouds.

By processing data locally on edge devices or gateways, AI models can make instantaneous decisions critical for real-time tasks such as quality inspection, machine control and safety monitoring. Edge computing also reduces network congestion and enhances data privacy, since sensitive information doesn’t always have to travel to the cloud. This hybrid approach balances the scalability of cloud computing with the responsiveness of edge processing.

Processing data at the edge minimizes exposure of sensitive operational data over networks, reducing the attack surface and enabling stronger data control and compliance with security policies.

Practical AI use cases in smart manufacturing

Digital twins for process optimization

One AT&T client, a major industrial equipment manufacturer, has successfully implemented AI combined with digital twin technology to optimize complex production processes.

Digital twins are precise virtual replicas of physical machines and factory operations, continuously fed real-time data from a dense network of sensors connected via fiber optics. AI algorithms compare digital twin simulations with actual performance, applying reinforcement learning to identify optimal process parameters. This dynamic adjustment improves yield, reduces energy use and minimizes waste.

Simultaneously, predictive maintenance models running on edge devices analyze vibration, temperature and acoustic data to forecast equipment failures. This shifts maintenance from reactive or scheduled downtime to prescriptive, condition-based interventions that minimize disruptions and extend equipment life. Centralized AI analytics platforms, supported by fiber optic connectivity, aggregate data across facilities for cross-site benchmarking and continuous improvement, fostering a data-driven, adaptive manufacturing environment.

Throughout these processes, robust cybersecurity measures such as encrypted data transmission, device authentication and continuous monitoring are critical to protecting the integrity of sensor data and AI models from tampering or cyber intrusions.

5G-enabled autonomous logistics

Another client, operating a large manufacturing plant, leverages AT&T wireless 5G connectivity to support a fleet of autonomous guided vehicles transporting components and finished goods.

The AGVs depend on reliable, low-latency communication to navigate dynamic factory layouts safely. A private 5G network employs a dedicated, local cellular network to help ensure mission-critical control signals have the coverage and capacity needed. Network slicing can take that coverage to another level by further prioritizing and partitioning resources to specific endpoints so in times of congestion, the mission critical endpoints get the resources needed. Onboard AI inference engines process sensor inputs in near real time, enabling immediate navigation and obstacle avoidance without delay.

This 5G-enabled wireless freedom allows the client to rapidly reconfigure production lines and material flows, avoiding costly rewiring or infrastructure changes. A centralized orchestration platform monitors the AGV fleet and dynamically assigns tasks to align with production schedules.

This setup highlights how combining AI with 5G connectivity removes physical constraints, enhances scalability and increases operational flexibility in manufacturing logistics.

The private 5G network environment also offers enhanced security by isolating critical communications from public networks, implementing strict access controls and enabling real-time threat detection to prevent unauthorized interference with autonomous vehicle operations.

AI-driven quality control at the edge­­—and in the cloud

A manufacturer specializing in high-precision components has revolutionized quality control by deploying AI-powered vision inspection systems integrated with edge and cloud computing.

High-speed industrial cameras capture tens of thousands of images per hour, transmitting them via fiber optics to edge servers where AI models perform real-time defect detection. These deep learning models help identify surface imperfections, dimensional deviations and assembly errors with accuracy surpassing human inspectors.

The AI systems continuously learn and adapt to new defect patterns emerging on the production line, helping to ensure consistent precision detection as product designs evolve. When defects are detected, immediate automated feedback loops remove faulty items and alert operators, reducing scrap and rework.

Meanwhile, aggregated data is sent to cloud platforms for long-term analytics and AI model retraining. This hybrid edge-cloud architecture balances the need for ultra-low latency responses with scalable training and analytics, underscoring the critical role connectivity plays in intelligent, responsive quality assurance.

Securing both edge and cloud environments with encryption, multi-factor authentication and compliance with data privacy standards helps ensure that sensitive product quality data remains protected while enabling effective AI-driven insights.

A framework for AI and connectivity integration

An effective framework for deploying AI and connectivity in manufacturing could include:

  • Sensing and data acquisition: A dense array of diverse IoT sensors—measuring vibration, heat, light and sound—form the data foundation. These connect through a mix of fiber optics for fixed, high-speed links and 5G for wireless flexibility. Proper sensor calibration helps ensure data quality.
  • Edge computing layer: Rugged edge devices run AI models locally for tasks needing fast response. Containerized AI allows easy updates and scaling for real-time detection, control and inspection without relying only on the cloud.
  • Connectivity infrastructure: A hybrid network blends fiber optics’ high bandwidth and low latency with 5G’s mobility and scalability. Network slicing and Quality of Service (QoS) prioritize critical traffic to keep safety and control systems running smoothly. Security protocols like encryption and continuous monitoring protect data from cyber threats.
  • Cloud and centralized analytics: Cloud platforms gather data from multiple edges for advanced AI training, trend analysis and factory benchmarking. They offer easy-to-use dashboards and decision tools to help operators and managers.
  • Integration and orchestration: AI systems connect seamlessly with Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and supply chain software for closed-loop automation. AI insights automatically adjust processes or alert staff, while humans oversee and improve operations.
  • Ethical and workforce considerations: Transparent AI models build trust, especially for safety-critical uses. Training programs boost employee skills in AI and data to prepare them for working alongside AI. Strong data governance helps ensure compliance and privacy.

Strategic benefits and the future of smart manufacturing

The convergence of AI and connectivity goes beyond incremental improvements to fundamentally reshape manufacturing capabilities:

  • Operational efficiency: Predictive maintenance and process optimization reduce downtime and resource use.
  • Quality excellence: Real-time adaptive vision inspection improves product consistency and reduces waste.
  • Logistical agility: Wireless 5G helps enable flexible material handling and rapid factory reconfiguration.
  • Supply chain resilience: Integrated AI analytics provide end-to-end visibility and proactive disruption management.
  • Workforce empowerment: Collaborative AI tools augment human expertise, fostering innovation and upskilling.

For leaders, adopting AI and connectivity as linked strategies is key.

Building these technologies into unified digital systems tailored to each factory’s needs will be vital for staying competitive. As these technologies evolve, future smart factories will use even smarter AI, quantum computing and next-gen connectivity to create truly autonomous, self-optimizing manufacturing.

Making sure these future systems have security built in from the start is crucial to protect valuable knowledge, keep operations running and build trust in fully autonomous factories.  M

About the Author:


Ande Hazard
is Vice President of Manufacturing, Transportation and Financial Services solutions, AT&T Business

 

View More